Press / to search

Chapter XVI - Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement

Section 242

Section 242: powers of the Tribunal

Section 242 lets the Tribunal make such order as it thinks fit to end the matters complained of in a section 241 application, where the affairs are oppressive or prejudicial and a winding-up would unfairly prejudice members although the facts would justify a just and equitable winding-up order.

On this page

Need advice on Section 242?

This article is for general information. Refer to the Companies Act, 2013 official text for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.

Contact us

Statutory text

Bare law

(1) If, on any application made under section 241, the Tribunal is of the opinion—(a) that the company’s affairs have been or are being conducted in a manner prejudicial or oppressive to any member or members or prejudicial to public interest or in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the company; and (b) that to wind up the company would unfairly prejudice such member or members, but that otherwise the facts would justify the making of a winding-up order on the ground that it was just and equitable that the company should be wound up, the Tribunal may, with a view to bringing to an end the matters complained of, make such order as it thinks fit. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of the powers under sub-section (1), an order under that sub-section may provide for—(a) the regulation of conduct of affairs of the company in future; (b) the purchase of shares or interests of any members of the company by other members thereof or by the company; (c) in the case of a purchase of its shares by the company as aforesaid, the consequent reduction of its share capital; (d) restrictions on the transfer or allotment of the shares of the company; (e) the termination, setting aside or modification, of any agreement, howsoever arrived at, between the company and the managing director, any other director or manager, upon such terms and conditions as may, in the opinion of the Tribunal, be just and equitable in the circumstances of the case; (f) the termination, setting aside or modification of any agreement between the company and any person other than those referred to in clause (e): Provided that no such agreement shall be terminated, set aside or modified except after due notice and after obtaining the consent of the party concerned; (g) the setting aside of any transfer, delivery of goods, payment, execution or other act relating to property made or done by or against the company within three months before the date of the application under this section, which would, if made or done by or against an individual, be deemed in his insolvency to be a fraudulent preference; (h) removal of the managing director, manager or any of the directors of the company; (i) recovery of undue gains made by any managing director, manager or director during the period of his appointment as such and the manner of utilisation of the recovery including transfer to Investor Education and Protection Fund or repayment to identifiable victims; (j) the manner in which the managing director or manager of the company may be appointed subsequent to an order removing the existing managing director or manager of the company made under clause (h); (k) appointment of such number of persons as directors, who may be required by the Tribunal to report to the Tribunal on such matters as the Tribunal may direct; (l) imposition of costs as may be deemed fit by the Tribunal; (m) any other matter for which, in the opinion of the Tribunal, it is just and equitable that provision should be made. (3) A certified copy of the order of the Tribunal under sub-section (1) shall be filed by the company with the Registrar within thirty days of the order of the Tribunal. (4) The Tribunal may, on the application of any party to the proceeding, make any interim order which it thinks fit for regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs upon such terms and conditions as appear to it to be just and equitable. (4A) At the conclusion of the hearing of the case in respect of sub-section (3) of section 241, the Tribunal shall record its decision stating therein specifically as to whether or not the respondent is a fit and proper person to hold the office of director or any other office connected with the conduct and management of any company. (5) Where an order of the Tribunal under sub-section (1) makes any alteration in the memorandum or articles of a company, then, notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the company shall not have power, except to the extent, if any, permitted in the order, to make, without the leave of the Tribunal, any alteration whatsoever which is inconsistent with the order, either in the memorandum or in the articles. (6) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (1), the alterations made by the order in the memorandum or articles of a company shall, in all respects, have the same effect as if they had been duly made by the company in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the said provisions shall apply accordingly to the memorandum or articles so altered. (7) A certified copy of every order altering, or giving leave to alter, a company’s memorandum or articles, shall within thirty days after the making thereof, be filed by the company with the Registrar who shall register the same. (8) If a company contravenes the provisions of sub-section (5), the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees.

Introduction

Sub-section (2) lists examples: regulating future conduct, buy-outs of members’ shares, restrictions on transfer or allotment, setting aside agreements and certain transfers made within three months before the application, removing managing directors or directors, recovering undue gains, appointing reporting directors and imposing costs. Interim orders are available.

Section 242 commenced on 1 June 2016 under S.O. 1934(E), except clause (b) of sub-section (1) and clauses (c) and (g) of sub-section (2), which India Code records as commenced on 9 September 2016 by S.O. 2912(E). Sub-section (4A) was inserted from 15 August 2019, and the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 removed imprisonment for officers in default under sub-section (8) from 21 December 2020.

Key takeaways

1

Two-part test

Oppressive or prejudicial conduct, and a winding-up that would unfairly prejudice members though just and equitable grounds exist.

2

Wide remedies

From regulating affairs and ordering buy-outs to removing directors and recovering undue gains.

3

Altered articles

Where the order alters the memorandum or articles, the company cannot make inconsistent changes without the Tribunal’s leave.

The test for relief

On an application under section 241, the Tribunal must be of the opinion that the company’s affairs have been or are being conducted in a manner prejudicial or oppressive to any member or members, prejudicial to public interest or prejudicial to the company’s interests; and that winding up the company would unfairly prejudice those members, although the facts would otherwise justify a winding-up order on the just and equitable ground. It may then make such order as it thinks fit to bring the matters complained of to an end.

Orders the Tribunal may make

Without limiting sub-section (1), the order may provide for: regulating the company’s future conduct; purchase of members’ shares or interests by other members or by the company, with consequent reduction of share capital; restrictions on transfer or allotment of shares; terminating, setting aside or modifying agreements with the managing director, any other director or manager on just and equitable terms; terminating, setting aside or modifying agreements with other persons, only after due notice and with the consent of the party concerned; setting aside transfers, payments and other acts relating to property within three months before the application that would be a fraudulent preference in an individual’s insolvency; removing the managing director, manager or any director; recovering undue gains, including transfer to the Investor Education and Protection Fund or repayment to identifiable victims; the manner of appointing a new managing director or manager; appointing directors to report to the Tribunal; costs; and any other just and equitable matter.

Interim orders and fitness decisions

On the application of any party, the Tribunal may make any interim order it thinks fit to regulate the conduct of the company’s affairs on just and equitable terms. In a case referred by the Central Government under section 241(3), the Tribunal must, at the end of the hearing, record a specific decision on whether the respondent is a fit and proper person to hold the office of director or any other office connected with the conduct and management of any company.

Filing and changes to the memorandum or articles

The company must file a certified copy of the order under sub-section (1) with the Registrar within thirty days. Where the order alters the memorandum or articles, the company cannot, without the Tribunal’s leave, make any inconsistent alteration except as permitted by the order; the alterations take effect as if made by the company under the Act, and the order must be filed with the Registrar within thirty days. Contravening sub-section (5) is punishable for the company with fine of one lakh rupees to twenty-five lakh rupees, and for every officer in default with fine of twenty-five thousand rupees to one lakh rupees.

Practical preparation

Frame the relief sought against the list in sub-section (2); consider interim relief early; after the order, file a certified copy with the Registrar within thirty days; amend the company’s copies of its memorandum and articles to reflect any alteration; seek the Tribunal’s leave before any later inconsistent change.

Practical checklist

Do

  • Plead the specific orders sought, with reference to sub-section (2).
  • File the certified copy of the order with the Registrar within thirty days.

Avoid

  • Do not alter articles changed by a Tribunal order without the Tribunal’s leave.
  • Do not assume agreements with outside parties can be set aside without notice and their consent.

Illustrative example

Hypothetical: deadlock with oppression

In a two-family company, one family excludes the other from management and diverts business to its own firm.

  1. Test

    The Tribunal finds oppressive conduct and that winding up the profitable company would unfairly prejudice the excluded family.

  2. Order

    It orders a buy-out at a fair value and sets aside the diversion agreement.

  3. Filing

    The company files a certified copy of the order with the Registrar within thirty days.

Outcome

  • The order ends the dispute without winding up a viable company.

Glossary

Just and equitable winding up
A winding-up order on the ground that it is just and equitable, which the Tribunal must find would be justified but unfairly prejudicial to members.
Fraudulent preference
A transfer or payment that would be treated as a preference in an individual’s insolvency, which the Tribunal may set aside if made within three months before the application.

Frequently asked questions

Can the Tribunal order the majority to buy out the minority?

Yes. Sub-section (2)(b) allows purchase of shares or interests of any members by other members or by the company.

What is the punishment for altering articles against the order?

The company is punishable with fine of not less than one lakh rupees and up to twenty-five lakh rupees, and every officer in default with fine of not less than twenty-five thousand rupees and up to one lakh rupees.

Can the Tribunal remove a director?

Yes. Sub-section (2)(h) allows removal of the managing director, manager or any of the directors.

Need help applying this provision to your situation?

Contact Bizeneed

Last updated 11 October 2026