Chapter XVI - Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement
Section 243
Section 243: consequence of termination or modification of certain agreements
Section 243 sets out what happens when an oppression and mismanagement order under section 242 terminates, sets aside or modifies an agreement with a managing director, other director or manager: no compensation claims, a five-year bar on re-appointment without the Tribunal’s leave, and a five-year bar on persons found not fit and proper.
On this page
Need advice on Section 243?
This article is for general information. Refer to the Companies Act, 2013 official text for the official provisions. If you need professional advice for your situation, contact Bizeneed.
Statutory text
Bare law
(1) Where an order made under section 242 terminates, sets aside or modifies an agreement such as is referred to in sub-section (2) of that section,—(a) such order shall not give rise to any claims whatever against the company by any person for damages or for compensation for loss of office or in any other respect either in pursuance of the agreement or otherwise; (b) no managing director or other director or manager whose agreement is so terminated or set aside shall, for a period of five years from the date of the order terminating or setting aside the agreement, without the leave of the Tribunal, be appointed, or act, as the managing director or other director or manager of the company: Provided that the Tribunal shall not grant leave under this clause unless notice of the intention to apply for leave has been served on the Central Government and that Government has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter. (1A) The person who is not a fit and proper person pursuant to sub-section (4A) of section 242 shall not hold the office of a director or any other office connected with the conduct and management of the affairs of any company for a period of five years from the date of the said decision: Provided that the Central Government may, with the leave of the Tribunal, permit such person to hold any such office before the expiry of the said period of five years. (1B) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, or any other law for the time being in force, or any contract, memorandum or articles, on the removal of a person from the office of a director or any other office connected with the conduct and management of the affairs of the company, that person shall not be entitled to, or be paid, any compensation for the loss or termination of office. (2) Any person who knowingly acts as a managing director or other director or manager of a company in contravention of clause (b) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A), and every other director of the company who is knowingly a party to such contravention, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees.
Introduction
Section 243 commenced on 1 June 2016 under S.O. 1934(E). The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, s. 35 inserted sub-sections (1A) and (1B) and extended sub-section (2) to them, in force from 15 August 2019 (S.O. 2947(E)). The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, s. 44 removed imprisonment from sub-section (2), in force from 21 December 2020 (S.O. 4646(E)).
Sub-sections (1A) and (1B) here follow the wording inserted by the 2019 Act ("office"), because the India Code consolidation prints "officer" and repeats some words.
Key takeaways
No compensation claims
An order terminating, setting aside or modifying the agreement does not give rise to claims against the company for damages, compensation for loss of office or otherwise.
Five-year bar
A managing director, director or manager whose agreement is terminated or set aside cannot be appointed or act as such in the company for five years without the Tribunal’s leave.
Not fit and proper
A person found not fit and proper under section 242(4A) cannot hold office as director or any other office connected with management of any company for five years, unless the Central Government permits with the Tribunal’s leave.
Penalty
Knowingly acting in breach, and every director knowingly a party, is punishable with fine up to five lakh rupees.
Effect on the agreement
Under sub-section (1), where an order under section 242 terminates, sets aside or modifies an agreement referred to in section 242(2): (a) the order does not give rise to any claim against the company by any person for damages or compensation for loss of office or in any other respect; and (b) no managing director, other director or manager whose agreement is terminated or set aside may, for five years from the date of the order and without the Tribunal’s leave, be appointed or act as managing director, other director or manager of the company.
The proviso requires notice of the intention to apply for leave to be served on the Central Government, with a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
- India Code — consolidated Companies Act, 2013, section 243
- eGazette — Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 (No. 22 of 2019)
- eGazette — MCA notification S.O. 2947(E), 14 August 2019 (2019 Amendment Act provisions in force 15 August 2019)
- eGazette — Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 (No. 29 of 2020)
- eGazette — MCA notification S.O. 4646(E) (2020 Amendment Act provisions in force 21 December 2020)
- eGazette — MCA notification S.O. 1934(E), 1 June 2016 (commencement)
Persons found not fit and proper
Under sub-section (1A), a person who is not a fit and proper person pursuant to section 242(4A) shall not hold the office of a director or any other office connected with the conduct and management of the affairs of any company for five years from the date of the decision. The Central Government may, with the leave of the Tribunal, permit the person to hold such office earlier.
Under sub-section (1B), notwithstanding any other provision of the Act, any other law, or any contract, memorandum or articles, a person removed from the office of a director or other such office is not entitled to, and must not be paid, any compensation for loss or termination of office.
Penalty
Under sub-section (2), any person who knowingly acts as a managing director, other director or manager in contravention of sub-section (1)(b) or sub-section (1A), and every other director knowingly a party to the contravention, is punishable with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees. Imprisonment was removed by the 2020 amendment.
Practical preparation
On receiving a section 242 order, update the register of directors and KMP and file the required forms; stop all payments of compensation to the removed person; block re-appointment for the barred period unless the Tribunal grants leave; and screen new appointments for any person found not fit and proper under section 242(4A).
Procedure, forms, fees and timelines for applications under this provision are set out in rules made under the Act and in the Tribunal’s procedure; check the current text of those rules, and any exemption notification for your class of company, before relying on this guide.
Practical checklist
Do
- Serve notice on the Central Government before applying to the Tribunal for leave.
- Check new director candidates for findings under section 242(4A).
Avoid
- Do not pay compensation for loss of office to a person removed in these circumstances.
- Do not let a barred person act as director or manager during the bar.
Illustrative example
Hypothetical: termination of a managing director’s contract
In an oppression case, the Tribunal sets aside the service agreement of a company’s managing director under section 242.
No claim
The managing director cannot claim compensation from the company.
Bar
For five years from the order, the person cannot be appointed or act as managing director, director or manager of the company without the Tribunal’s leave.
Leave
Any application for leave must be preceded by notice to the Central Government.
Outcome
- Board members who knowingly allow the person to act during the bar risk a fine.
Glossary
- Section 242 order
- An order of the Tribunal on an application for relief against oppression or mismanagement under section 241.
- Fit and proper person
- A finding the Tribunal may record under section 242(4A) in relation to a person involved in the affairs of the company.
Frequently asked questions
Can a removed managing director claim damages?
No. Sub-section (1)(a) says the order does not give rise to any claim against the company for damages or compensation for loss of office.
Can a barred person ever return earlier?
Under sub-section (1)(b), with the Tribunal’s leave after notice to the Central Government. Under sub-section (1A), the Central Government may permit it with the Tribunal’s leave.
Is imprisonment still possible under sub-section (2)?
No. Since the 2020 amendment, sub-section (2) provides only a fine which may extend to five lakh rupees.
Need help applying this provision to your situation?
Contact BizeneedLast updated 12 October 2026